Ever waited for clothes to air dry instead of changing into a fresh pair? A peculiar thought, right? But, ponder this: have you considered swapping an Electric Vehicle's batteries instead of charging them?

Enterprising ventures like 'Better Place' delved into this notion. Despite their daring attempts, they faced a staggering downfall. The ascension and collapse of 'Better Place,' spearheaded by the visionary Shai Agassi, cast a shadow on the concept itself.

Yet, here at nexLOOP, we're not fixated on past failures. Our focus lies on potential successes or critical analyses.

This historical recollection sets the stage for a new player—Ample. Unlike its predecessors, Ample steps onto the scene, backed by significant advancements.

Engaged in battery technology since 2014, Ample recently emerged from obscurity. With a hefty $31 million in funding, Ample forged partnerships with 'Eneos,' a Japanese energy giant, and 'Sally,' a New York-based taxi and ride-hailing service.

Ample: Battery Swapping Technology

Now, let's delve briefly into Ample's groundbreaking battery swapping technology.

Ample's vision involves establishing battery swapping stations akin to traditional gas stations. Here, within a mere 10 minutes, the drained battery module, specially designed for easy detachment, is exchanged for a fully charged module through automated machinery.

For the cautious souls wary of 'Skynet' scenarios, fear not—Ample ensures each station will have human oversight. The overall process mirrors a gas station visit but with added steps, employing a hydraulic lift and requiring a few extra minutes.

While the exact costs remain undisclosed, Ample pledges a 10-20% reduction in expenses compared to gasoline. Furthermore, beyond battery swapping and recharging, Ample eyes repurposing shelved batteries for transient grid support systems, hinting at future sustainability initiatives.

Ample Vs Better Place: Battery Swapping Technology?

As previously stated, Ample's endeavors echo past initiatives, allowing for a comparative analysis with its unsuccessful predecessor, 'Better Place.' This examination aims to identify potential differences, if any exist. Much like the age-old adage suggests, "Wise people learn from other's mistakes and not from their own."

Let's explore the geographical distinctions between 'Better Place' and 'Ample.' 'Better Place' primarily operated in Israel, facing challenges such as bureaucratic hurdles that slowed down infrastructure development, as reported by notable media outlets like 'The Guardian.' Moreover, the concept of new EV technology wasn't embraced as anticipated by the Israeli populace, resulting in minimal unit sales.

On the contrary, 'Ample' focuses on the lucrative markets of the US and Japan, renowned for their proactive approach toward EVs. These markets offer tax incentives and schemes to foster and bolster Electric Vehicle technology adoption.

From a consumer perspective, both 'Ample' and 'Better Place' employ similar tech, offering a drive-through experience for battery swapping. While 'Better Place' boasted a rapid 5-minute swap, 'Ample' takes slightly longer at 10 minutes. However, the approach to infrastructure differs significantly. 'Better Place' established standalone swapping stations, each costing approximately $3 million after unsuccessful attempts to collaborate with existing gas stations.

In contrast, 'Ample' has secured partnerships with oil giants like 'Shell' and 'Repsol.' 'Shell,' with its market-leading status and an extensive network of about 25,000 gas stations in the US, stands as a formidable ally for 'Ample.' Notably, 'Ample's' swapping stations occupy only two parking spaces, demonstrating a more efficient utilization of infrastructure.

The divergence between 'Ample' and 'Better Place' extends beyond infrastructure; it significantly manifests in their targeted customer base.

Better Place directed its focus toward private vehicle owners using electric vehicles for their daily commuting needs. Conversely, Ample targets fleets like ride-hailing and taxi services. The distinct contrast between these niches holds a clear answer.

Consider the Tesla Model S, capable of covering approximately 650 kilometers in a single charge, with a fast-charging ability to cover nearly half that range in just 15 minutes. For instance, a trip from Delhi to Bikaner, spanning 550 kilometers, would leave a Tesla Model S driver with around 100 kilometers of charge remaining.

On the other hand, the Nissan Leaf Plus, with a range of about 360 kilometers per charge, prompts reflection on when an individual might require a 650-kilometer range in one continuous drive, especially without charging options readily available.

For everyday commuters or those engaged in fairly long-distance travel, fast-charging facilities often suffice, particularly in countries with advanced e-mobility infrastructure. Charging setups at offices and public spaces cater to vehicles while idle, rendering battery swapping unnecessary for regular commuters.

Israel, lacking these facilities and exhibiting limited interest in EVs, failed to embrace battery swapping. However, for fleets like taxis and ride-hailing services, time and distance take precedence. In these service sectors, even a few minutes significantly impacts operations, reflected not in angry passengers but in ratings and reviews, potentially impacting business.

The time disparity between swapping and fast charging becomes crucial, as does the difference in traveled distances. Both 'Better Place' and 'Ample' offer about a 20% cost reduction compared to fuel prices. While an average traveler might save around ₹200 with swapping technology, a commercial driver consuming approximately 100 liters daily could save ₹2000.

Considering these variables, battery swapping emerges as a technology more suited for commercial purposes, aligning with Ample's strategic targeting of commercial fleets. This conclusion underscores two key takeaways.

Indeed, nations worldwide are enforcing stringent regulations to shift a significant portion of ride-hailing and online taxi services to electric modes of transit. Simultaneously, the current era witnesses EV companies expanding their commercial fleet outreach, moving beyond passenger commuting. Both factors potentially favor Ample's prospects. However, before singing praises for 'Ample,' it's crucial to address the impending challenges that the company may confront. Not surprisingly, these challenges echo those faced by 'Better Place.' Amongst 'Better Place's' numerous missteps, its failure to onboard various EV manufacturers stood out. This limitation restricted customer choices, confining the company to a single model offering. 'Ample,' although claiming to offer nine choices for customers, remains somewhat opaque about the specific models. Thus, while 'Ample' attempts to avoid 'Better Place's' downfall, it's not entirely in the clear. The ability to refuel at any gas station stems from standardization - vehicles, fuel tanks, and associated mechanisms are calibrated to run on standard fuels. This standardization isn't applicable to Ample's battery swapping. To utilize Ample's swapping stations, vehicles must be adapted to accommodate Ample's battery module and mechanism. While their current consumer base might accommodate this requirement, future plans to position 'Ample' as the gas stations of the future appear fraught with challenges and potential limitations.

Challenges for Electric Vehicle Manufacturing to Develop Better Batteries 

What are the odds that all the EV manufacturers competing to develop better batteries and thereby monopolizing the market will join hands to standardize their battery modules to make swapping possible?

Tesla has its sights set on DC fast charging technology and shows little to no interest in battery swapping. In fact, Tesla's history includes its own tale of a failed attempt with battery swapping technology, suggesting they might prefer to leave that chapter behind. 
 The challenge of uniting various EV manufacturers under a standardized battery technology umbrella remains far from practical. The technology that ultimately achieves this feat could potentially hold the key to market dominance and even monopoly. 
 Another concern for Ample revolves around managing the storage of EV batteries, particularly Li-ion batteries, which demand precise storage facilities and management practices due to their nature. The meticulous efforts of EV manufacturers to maintain optimal battery conditions underscore the critical importance of battery management. 
 Despite these challenges, battery swapping has seen some success in China. It offers practicality, familiarity, and potentially resolves the debate around battery ownership and maintenance, often a dispute between EV and battery manufacturers. 
 Centralizing battery management through a dedicated third party streamlines operations and addresses concerns related to battery pollution and recycling. Moreover, by decoupling the purchase of the battery module from the EV itself, this technology could substantially reduce EV costs, ranging from 20% to 40% depending on the manufacturer. 
 Yet, the fate of 'Ample' and battery swapping technology remains uncertain. Although 'Ample' shares similarities with 'Better Place' in terms of technology, their targeted audience and approach differ significantly. 'Ample' has succeeded in areas where 'Better Place' faced failures attributed to mismanagement and lack of planning, as reported by various outlets post-'Better Place's' demise. 
 Ultimately, the potential success of 'Ample' and battery swapping technology remains ambiguous, with uncertainties dictating potential outcomes in this dynamic landscape.

Indeed, Evan Thornley, the successor of Shai Agassi as CEO of Better Place, expressed confidence in the company's vision by stating, "I continue to believe that the Better Place vision is both accurate and commercially sound, and trust that whatever shortfalls we suffer are correctly seen as errors of execution and not of strategy." This sentiment underscores a persistent belief in the core vision and commercial viability of Better Place, attributing any setbacks to execution errors rather than strategic misalignment.

The aftermath of Better Place's downfall witnessed widespread skepticism toward battery swapping technology within the discourse of search engines and beyond. Challenges highlighted earlier, combined with the swift advancements in technologies like DC fast charging and improved battery efficiency, have cast doubts on the prospects of battery swapping.

However, despite the limitations of existing technologies, especially in the commercial wave of EVs, battery swapping presents a potential success story, particularly in commercial applications. Embracing diversity in charging solutions could hold promise, considering the foundational principle of survival based on diversity, as per the Darwinian concept.

The landscape of battery tech and charging need not conform to a monopoly or universal standard, unlike our conventional notions associated with IC vehicles. Embracing change is vital, whether in adopting an EV ecosystem or adapting to non-standardized refueling systems.

Instead of aligning with the pessimistic view that "battery swapping will fail," this article maintains a neutral stance, acknowledging Ample's potential for success while recognizing uncertainties. Notably, many successful companies initially faced uncertain prospects before eventually carving their path to success.

If you found this article informative, consider sharing it with your friends. Your thoughts and suggestions are always welcome; feel free to engage with us on social media.